|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on May 20, 2018 0:15:50 GMT 10
Did anyone watch the coverage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's wedding? I watched about ten minutes worth of it (namely the part when Meghan Markle was about to enter St George's Chapel), but then I switched channels. 
|
|
|
|
Post by rainbow on May 20, 2018 0:43:53 GMT 10
Didn't watch it. It doesn't really appeal to me.
EyewitnessTV likes this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2018 0:52:00 GMT 10
Didn't watch it at all, I don't give a flying shit about the Royal family...!
|
|
|
|
Post by EyewitnessTV on May 20, 2018 0:52:31 GMT 10
Did anyone watch the coverage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's wedding? I watched about ten minutes worth of it (namely the part when Meghan Markle was about to enter St George's Chapel), but then I switched channels. Yep! Funnily enough, I was painting a wall earlier tonight and got distracted by it. Hmmm..... oh well. I’m sure I’ll catch up with all the goss in tomorrow’s news!  
Mibblez likes this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2018 1:17:21 GMT 10
I don't have a television and wouldn't have watched it if I did. Sod the Royals!
|
|
|
|
Post by mwalker96 on May 20, 2018 1:43:08 GMT 10
My Mom was up 4 in the morning my time watching it, I'm not into the wedding but the story of how they met is intresting though.
God Less America likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by God Less America on May 20, 2018 2:49:20 GMT 10
Watching paint dry comes to mind. £53m out of the public coffers, money can be better used elsewhere. Of course they could have said, nah we don't want all that fuss and attention, let's keep it low-key and have a jolly up at Maccy D's afterwards. But they didn't. Funny that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mibblez on May 20, 2018 7:21:05 GMT 10
I watched parts of it. Pretty neat honestly.
|
|
|
|
Post by longaotian on May 20, 2018 8:19:16 GMT 10
I was at work so I couldn't watch it, but my aunty was calling me up saying I should record it and watch it later......no thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on May 20, 2018 11:48:49 GMT 10
I didn't care about the royal wedding either, to be honest. I only watched ten minutes of it, because there was literally nothing else on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2018 12:19:51 GMT 10
I personally didn't care for the Royal Wedding at all so didn't really watch it, but from all reports about the Australian TV coverage...
*Seven did well by having Michael Usher & Melissa Doyle front the coverage. Can someone make these two the main Sydney 6pm newsreaders already?
*Nine's coverage could've done with a bit of Peter Overton. Surely he would've been a better presenter than Karl Stefanovic anyway?
*Ten's ratings for their "alternative programing" were very poor and perhaps an all time low. Apparently they were running coverage on TenDaily, so why wasn't this on the main channel? In 2018, alternative programing should be left for multichannels IMO!
|
|
|
|
Post by Attorney General ReignMan on May 20, 2018 12:34:02 GMT 10
I watched it. It was a nice event.
|
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on May 20, 2018 17:24:58 GMT 10
I personally didn't care for the Royal Wedding at all so didn't really watch it, but from all reports about the Australian TV coverage... *Seven did well by having Michael Usher & Melissa Doyle front the coverage. Can someone make these two the main Sydney 6pm newsreaders already? *Nine's coverage could've done with a bit of Peter Overton. Surely he would've been a better presenter than Karl Stefanovic anyway? *Ten's ratings for their "alternative programing" were very poor and perhaps an all time low. Apparently they were running coverage on TenDaily, so why wasn't this on the main channel? In 2018, alternative programing should be left for multichannels IMO! I agree on all points. I guess you could make the argument that Ten are simply catering for the growing demand/interest in streaming services, although it still doesn't excuse the fact that the programming on the main channel was of poor standard.
|
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Oct 15, 2018 19:03:36 GMT 10
Not directly related to the Royal Wedding, but Kensington Palace has announced within the past hour that Meghan Markle is pregnant. The baby is expected to be due in the Spring of 2019.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2018 21:29:29 GMT 10
Not directly related to the Royal Wedding, but Kensington Palace has announced within the past hour that Meghan Markle is pregnant. The baby is expected to be due in the Spring of 2019. That's the Northern Hemisphere Spring, so our Autumn - I'm sure all the women's magazines & breakfast/mid-morning programs will be delighted! It'll be an extremely busy time for news from a Sydney/NSW perspective though, with our next State & Federal Elections (which IMO have far wider reaching implications than a woman giving birth, but that's a debate for another time) expected to sometime happen around then.
SharksFan99 likes this
|
|
