|
|
Post by John Titor on Mar 3, 2019 4:05:43 GMT 10
Do you think it was ISIs that really put a damper on things?
|
|
|
|
Post by Telso on Mar 3, 2019 7:05:01 GMT 10
Why were they supposed to end up lighter in the first place?
|
|
|
|
Post by John Titor on Mar 3, 2019 7:15:17 GMT 10
Why were they supposed to end up lighter in the first place? yes
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2019 10:21:05 GMT 10
No, most of the social movements of the mid-2010s had their origins in the late 2000s/early 2010s including the alt-right itself (and the European far-right is even older was gaining ground before that). Most people more or less predicted some form unrest after the Recession.
|
|
|
|
Post by Telso on Mar 3, 2019 20:46:54 GMT 10
Why were they supposed to end up lighter in the first place? yes You're not answering my question
|
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Mar 3, 2019 20:57:32 GMT 10
I very much doubt it. Even in a hypothetical world where the Boston Bombings, MH370 disappearance, Ebola outbreak and the rise of ISIS had never occurred, many of the tensions that we witnessed during the Mid 2010s still would have arisen to the extent that they had. Societal issues such as the #MeToo movement and the rise of alt-right politics wouldn't have just gone away. Also, regardless of the circumstances, pop-culture still would have eventually moved away from it's flashy, dance-orientated influences in the Early 2010s.
|
|
