|
|
Post by John Titor on Mar 9, 2019 5:05:45 GMT 10
Rank all of the years of the 2000s with a 10 point scale.
Here is my list
2000: 4/10
2001: 9/10
2002: 10/10
2003: 2/10
2004: 9/10
2005: 10/10
2006: 9/10
2007: 4/10
2008: 7/10
2009: 1/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Cassie on Mar 10, 2019 1:52:58 GMT 10
I'll rank the ones I wasn't alive for or can't remember for the culture.
2000: 6/10
2001: 8/10
2002: 7/10
2003: 9/10
2004: 8/10
2005: 10/10
2006: 9/10
2007: 10/10
2008: 7/10
2009: 6/10
|
|
|
|
Post by John Titor on Mar 10, 2019 4:07:53 GMT 10
I'll rank the ones I wasn't alive for or can't remember for the culture. 2000: 6/10 2001: 8/10 2002: 7/10 2003: 9/10 2004: 8/10 2005: 10/10 2006: 9/10 2007: 10/10 2008: 7/10 2009: 6/10 I think everyone on the board can agree 2005 was top quality
Cassie likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by astropoug on Jul 15, 2021 5:22:59 GMT 10
Rank all of the years of the 2000s with a 10 point scale.
Here is my list
2000: 4/10
2001: 9/10
2002: 10/10
2003: 2/10
2004: 9/10
2005: 10/10
2006: 9/10
2007: 4/10
2008: 7/10
2009: 1/10What do you have against 2003 lmao You’re gonna trigger SharksFan, he really likes that year
|
|
|
|
Post by John Titor on Jul 15, 2021 6:08:59 GMT 10
Rank all of the years of the 2000s with a 10 point scale.
Here is my list
2000: 4/10
2001: 9/10
2002: 10/10
2003: 2/10
2004: 9/10
2005: 10/10
2006: 9/10
2007: 4/10
2008: 7/10
2009: 1/10What do you have against 2003 lmao You’re gonna trigger SharksFan, he really likes that year didn't feel as strong as other years but... having said that this is my new REVISION ranking of the 2000s years JOHN TITOR'S NEW RANKING 2000: 2/10
2001: 9/10
2002: 10/10
2003: 5/10
2004: 9/10
2005: 10/10
2006: 9/10
2007: 4/10
2008: 7/10
2009: 1/10
2001 would have gotten a full 10/10 if not for 9/11 and the early part of 2001 being long in the tooth, 2004 would have gotten a 10/10 but it was more for the last half of 2004.
|
|
