|
|
Post by longaotian on Oct 19, 2017 14:28:06 GMT 10
1. 2000's 2. 1990s 3. 1980s 4. 1970s 5. 1960s Tbh I feel like I'm being a bit biased for putting the 2000's first lol Haha, that's like me listing the '90s first, since I was born in 1999.  I don't think it's bias though.  I'm not biased towards the 2000s becasue I was born in 2000, I just think it was a good decade. I put the 2010s first anyway. 
SharksFan99 likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by longaotian on Oct 19, 2017 14:28:45 GMT 10
1. 2000's 2. 1990s 3. 1980s 4. 1970s 5. 1960s Tbh I feel like I'm being a bit biased for putting the 2000's first lol So basically your ranking goes from newest to oldest, lol .
|
|
|
|
Post by rainbow on Oct 20, 2017 0:27:27 GMT 10
Haha, that's like me listing the '90s first, since I was born in 1999. I don't think it's bias though. I'm not biased towards the 2000s becasue I was born in 2000, I just think it was a good decade. I put the 2010s first anyway.  I didn’t put the 2010’s cause the decade isn’t over yet but it’s a tie between the 2000s being first place and the 2010’s
|
|
|
|
Post by EyewitnessTV on Oct 21, 2017 22:59:42 GMT 10
1. 2000's 2. 1990s 3. 1980s 4. 1970s 5. 1960s Tbh I feel like I'm being a bit biased for putting the 2000's first lol Where are the 2010s? He purposely left the 2010s out because they are just that terrible. I don’t blame him, I congratulate him!!  
SharksFan99 and Cassie like this
|
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Oct 21, 2017 23:07:30 GMT 10
He purposely left the 2010s out because they are just that terrible. I don’t blame him, I congratulate him!! I agree with that!  Sorry longaotian.
|
|
|
|
Post by EyewitnessTV on Oct 22, 2017 0:07:30 GMT 10
He purposely left the 2010s out because they are just that terrible. I don’t blame him, I congratulate him!!  I agree with that! Sorry longaotian . WTF. Don’t be sorry you! 😜 This decade has been Lame - and that’s with a capital “L”.
SharksFan99 and Cassie like this
|
|
|
|
Post by longaotian on Oct 22, 2017 5:06:11 GMT 10
He purposely left the 2010s out because they are just that terrible. I don’t blame him, I congratulate him!! *She
EyewitnessTV likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by EyewitnessTV on Oct 22, 2017 5:44:58 GMT 10
*She Haha, yep of course. There’s too males on here it’s out of habit lol. SharksFan99 needs to investigate why this is! 😛 This decade is not crappy. It is normal and better than others. The early 2010s are my favorite years. I beg to differ. Like others who will remain unnamed, no bias with your favourite of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Oct 22, 2017 13:52:07 GMT 10
*She Haha, yep of course. There’s too males on here it’s out of habit lol. SharksFan99 needs to investigate why this is! 😛 Maybe I should launch a first hand investigation into the matter, lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Oct 22, 2017 14:59:23 GMT 10
WTF. Don’t be sorry you! 😜 This decade has been Lame - and that’s with a capital “L”. But longaotian and rainbow both like the pop culture of this decade.
EyewitnessTV likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by longaotian on Oct 22, 2017 18:25:11 GMT 10
WTF. Don’t be sorry you! 😜 This decade has been Lame - and that’s with a capital “L”. Dude WTF are you even talking about? maybe u should go live back in 1992 
|
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Oct 22, 2017 18:25:59 GMT 10
WTF. Don’t be sorry you! 😜 This decade has been Lame - and that’s with a capital “L”. Dude WTF are you even talking about? maybe u should go live back in 1992 I would prefer to experience 1992 over 2017.
|
|
|
|
Post by longaotian on Oct 22, 2017 18:42:34 GMT 10
Dude WTF are you even talking about? maybe u should go live back in 1992  I would prefer to experience 1992 over 2017. I would like to visit 1992, but wouldn't want to stay there. I don't like 2017 too much either, tbh .
SharksFan99 likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Oct 22, 2017 18:44:09 GMT 10
I would prefer to experience 1992 over 2017. I would like to visit 1992, but wouldn't want to stay there. I don't like 2017 too much either, tbh . That's fair enough. I wouldn't mind staying in 1992, if it meant that I could experience the Grunge explosion and the lead-up to the year 2000.
|
|
|
|
Post by longaotian on Oct 22, 2017 18:47:08 GMT 10
I would like to visit 1992, but wouldn't want to stay there. I don't like 2017 too much either, tbh . That's fair enough. I wouldn't mind staying in 1992, if it meant that I could experience the Grunge explosion and the lead-up to the year 2000. Couldn't stand the technology. There would be no Popedia either, LOL  .
|
|
I don't think it's bias though. 
Sorry 
.