|
Post by SharksFan99 on Nov 25, 2019 9:30:16 GMT 10
We've had discussions over how we should handle this incident and this is the decision we've come to. We don't believe Captain Nemo purposely intended for his original post to be racist. In the post, he is describing how the right-wing has become the "counter-culture" of the 2010s. Not once did he mention Jews in any way or suggest that prejudice or discrimination should be carried out against Jews. However, in saying that, we can also see how the reference to the Rothschilds family can be considered offensive. I can personally understand where @loosebolt is coming from. There are numerous conspiracy theories out there linking the Rothschilds with anti-Semitic beliefs and given the context, it is a touchy subject. Making the point that the Rothschilds have control of the world's media and finances is essentially 'playing with fire'; it's something that is going to spark criticism. Since Captain Nemo has no history of being involved in any previous incidents on the forum and the conclusion that we've reached over how the original post was not intended to be racist, please take this as a general word of warning. I think you need to be a bit more careful with your wording in future, especially if you're going to voice controversial opinions which have the potential to offend others. It's a case of misunderstanding really. Just as a side note - If someone is causing you distress on the forum, in addition to reporting the member in question, you can also choose to block the member and prevent them from interacting with you. To do so, click on "Edit Profile", go to the "Privacy" tab and if you scroll down the page, you will see the option of entering the username of the member you wish to block. There, you will have the options of hiding a member's posts, as well as blocking notifications from them, preventing them from "following" your profile or activity, as well as blocking them from starting new conversations with you.
rainbow and Captain Nemo like this
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Nov 25, 2019 9:49:45 GMT 10
Anyway, to get back on topic, I would consider the 2010s to be more of a liberal decade. Politics aside, the level of social progress made over the past decade has also been reflected in many of the pop culture trends. I mean, look at how well Lizzo is doing at the moment. People are embracing her for her "size" and the fact that she has been so successful does wonders to promote a healthy body image.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2019 0:33:16 GMT 10
It was liberal up until around 2017 but now I think things are the most conservative that they’ve been since the 1950s. These days it seems like people want strong institutions, religion to play a central role in society, and strong conformism to a set of traditional social norms.
|
|
|
Post by mc98 on Nov 27, 2019 1:00:13 GMT 10
It was liberal up until around 2017 but now I think things are the most conservative that they’ve been since the 1950s. These days it seems like people want strong institutions, religion to play a central role in society, and strong conformism to a set of traditional social norms. Honestly, you are just repeating the same thing over and over again without evidence. That small town in Oklahoma you live in is driving you crazy. Move out NOW.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2019 1:17:37 GMT 10
It was liberal up until around 2017 but now I think things are the most conservative that they’ve been since the 1950s. These days it seems like people want strong institutions, religion to play a central role in society, and strong conformism to a set of traditional social norms. Honestly, you are just repeating the same thing over and over again without evidence. That small town in Oklahoma you live in is driving you crazy. Move out NOW. No, I would say it extends to the federal discourse. Even deep blue states like New York, Massachusetts, and California have their deep red districts.
|
|