|
|
Post by karlpalaka on Dec 19, 2019 11:54:46 GMT 10
I was just an embryo, and five months later, the family got miserable. I thought u were born in 93 Nah, I was actually born in 97, though it would be cool if I was born in 93 or 94 so I could have started primary school in the 90s. I dont really care though, cause I knowmany born in 93 or 94 who dont have any memories of experiences they had in the 90s as adults, but luckily I managed to create a few, and I was old enough to attend preschool in 99 being two for almost two thirds of the year, and every year will have its differences as being born in 93 or 94 would make me wish I was born in 89 so I could have been alive for the full 90s, and I have heard a few saying they wish they were born later, and being born in 88 or 89 would make me wish I was born before 84 so I could have been alive before cell phones were first used publically. Me, I dont care, but if I had to change my year of birth, I would choose 94 instead of 97, since being born in 95 or 96 wont make a difference as I would still be just a preschooler in the 90s, and being born later would mean I would miss out on spending more time in an analog world. However, Pew's new cutoff of 96 makes me wish I was born five months earlier in December 96 as most sources using 1996 as the cutoff for millennials actually admit it is cause of Pew.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Titor on Dec 19, 2019 12:32:06 GMT 10
I thought u were born in 93 Nah, I was actually born in 97, though it would be cool if I was born in 93 or 94 so I could have started primary school in the 90s. I dont really care though, cause I knowmany born in 93 or 94 who dont have any memories of experiences they had in the 90s as adults, but luckily I managed to create a few, and I was old enough to attend preschool in 99 being two for almost two thirds of the year, and every year will have its differences as being born in 93 or 94 would make me wish I was born in 89 so I could have been alive for the full 90s, and I have heard a few saying they wish they were born later, and being born in 88 or 89 would make me wish I was born before 84 so I could have been alive before cell phones were first used publically. Me, I dont care, but if I had to change my year of birth, I would choose 94 instead of 97, since being born in 95 or 96 wont make a difference as I would still be just a preschooler in the 90s, and being born later would mean I would miss out on spending more time in an analog world. However, Pew's new cutoff of 96 makes me wish I was born five months earlier in December 96 as most sources using 1996 as the cutoff for millennials actually admit it is cause of Pew. Pew Dew Pie I never really watched him
|
|
|
|
Post by karlpalaka on Dec 20, 2019 2:27:15 GMT 10
Nah, I was actually born in 97, though it would be cool if I was born in 93 or 94 so I could have started primary school in the 90s. I dont really care though, cause I knowmany born in 93 or 94 who dont have any memories of experiences they had in the 90s as adults, but luckily I managed to create a few, and I was old enough to attend preschool in 99 being two for almost two thirds of the year, and every year will have its differences as being born in 93 or 94 would make me wish I was born in 89 so I could have been alive for the full 90s, and I have heard a few saying they wish they were born later, and being born in 88 or 89 would make me wish I was born before 84 so I could have been alive before cell phones were first used publically. Me, I dont care, but if I had to change my year of birth, I would choose 94 instead of 97, since being born in 95 or 96 wont make a difference as I would still be just a preschooler in the 90s, and being born later would mean I would miss out on spending more time in an analog world. However, Pew's new cutoff of 96 makes me wish I was born five months earlier in December 96 as most sources using 1996 as the cutoff for millennials actually admit it is cause of Pew. Pew Dew Pie I never really watched him I am talking about Pew Research. They had it at 1997 for a really long time until some time last year when they changed it to 1996. Not sure why.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Titor on Dec 23, 2019 13:56:30 GMT 10
Pew Dew Pie I never really watched him I am talking about Pew Research. They had it at 1997 for a really long time until some time last year when they changed it to 1996. Not sure why. ohhhhhhhhhhh
|
|
|
|
Post by al on Dec 23, 2019 14:35:03 GMT 10
Those video games must’ve seemed really expensive, I remember the $59 ones seeming crazy in more like 03. Still seems expensive tbh.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Titor on Dec 23, 2019 15:21:09 GMT 10
Those video games must’ve seemed really expensive, I remember the $59 ones seeming crazy in more like 03. Still seems expensive tbh. its one of the reasons why everyone started moving towards Playstation because Cartridges cost more for buyers and developers. I miss that we had Blockbuster back then so we could rent the game opposed to buying it, so in case the game sucks you didn't waste your money. With Nintendo 64 you could only buy the best games because it was too much to take a chance on a dud. I had both systems and was careful on what n64 games I got.
|
|
|
|
Post by karlpalaka on Dec 24, 2019 6:59:53 GMT 10
Those video games must’ve seemed really expensive, I remember the $59 ones seeming crazy in more like 03. Still seems expensive tbh. its one of the reasons why everyone started moving towards Playstation because Cartridges cost more for buyers and developers. I miss that we had Blockbuster back then so we could rent the game opposed to buying it, so in case the game sucks you didn't waste your money. With Nintendo 64 you could only buy the best games because it was too much to take a chance on a dud. I had both systems and was careful on what n64 games I got. Ah, Cartridges. Takes me back to Sega. We got rid of our Sega in late 2003 for the original XBOX, which switched to CD's. XBOX one is a nightmare as you have to install and download games, and it takes forever. I love just simply inserting the disk in and playing.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Titor on Dec 24, 2019 9:55:29 GMT 10
its one of the reasons why everyone started moving towards Playstation because Cartridges cost more for buyers and developers. I miss that we had Blockbuster back then so we could rent the game opposed to buying it, so in case the game sucks you didn't waste your money. With Nintendo 64 you could only buy the best games because it was too much to take a chance on a dud. I had both systems and was careful on what n64 games I got. Ah, Cartridges. Takes me back to Sega. We got rid of our Sega in late 2003 for the original XBOX, which switched to CD's. XBOX one is a nightmare as you have to install and download games, and it takes forever. I love just simply inserting the disk in and playing. so you went from 16 bit Sega to Xbox? Damn what a jump
|
|
