|
Post by SharksFan99 on Jul 31, 2018 21:54:01 GMT 10
Studies have shown that cognitive development continues until your mid-20s. Injury is the single biggest killer of Australian youth (those aged between 17-25) and out of those fatalities, 45% of injury-related deaths are due to road traffic crashes. It begs the question; should the minimum driving age be raised? Is age 16 simply too young for someone to learn how to drive a motor vehicle?
I personally believe age 16 is an appropriate starting point for learning how to drive, altogether I can see the point of view from those who would like to see the minimum driving age raised. Ultimately though, I don't think it makes sense to raise the minimum driving age. Why should a minority ruin it for those who do follow the road rules and are more than capable of driving? Even if you were to raise it to age 18 or 21, there will still be a small faction of the public who will put others on the road at risk.
|
|
|
Post by rainbow on Jul 31, 2018 23:47:06 GMT 10
The reason why 16 and 17-year-olds are the most likely to get into car crashes is that they're still new to driving. Raising the driving age wouldn't do anything except raise the age of who is the most likely to get in a car crash. Cognitive development IMO plays a very little role. You can know the dangers of driving without a fully developed brain.
SharksFan99 and EyewitnessTV like this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 3:07:13 GMT 10
Yes, to 25.
|
|
|
Post by al on Aug 1, 2018 4:11:41 GMT 10
I agree with rainbow that the issue is more about teen drivers being inexperienced than it is their age. The problem with the cognition argument is that it can spiral out of control. Should one really have a job then if their brain is still developing? Should they be able to get themselves into debt, should they be able to enter the military? Interestingly, the draft used to start at age 21, but was changed during WWII because the 18yos would supposedly act more impulsively, and therefore be less hesitant at the front lines. Seems plausible enough. But it really wouldn't be fair to spin that theory back around, saying that adolescent attitude can serve the will of others, though forbid one's own decision making.
rainbow likes this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 7:06:16 GMT 10
I think the doling out of driver's licences should be privatized to insurance companies, and they can decide if they want to insure and license reckless teenage (or adults) drivers or not.
EyewitnessTV likes this
|
|
|
Post by dount2005 on Aug 1, 2018 7:25:51 GMT 10
No, 16 is about right.
|
|