|
Post by SharksFan99 on Aug 28, 2018 22:09:42 GMT 10
I personally wouldn't deem this as being decadeology. Even though this thread is based on comparing decades, the topic itself is strictly speaking about the overall pop culture of decades, not arbritrary cut-offs and "vibes". Also, I think this could lead to an interesting, constructive discussion and i'm intrigued to hear other people's opinions on this topic. I'd personally say that the 1990s and the 2000s are the most culturally similar decades, at least in recent history. In a general sense, I feel as though the 2000s were really just a glossy, over-commercialized progression of Late '90s pop culture. I went into detail in this thread about how I personally believe that 1991-2008 can be regarded as the "transition" between the analogue age and the digital age. While there are a lot of differences between the two decades (not just in terms of aesthetics, but also what was popular/relevant), of course, however there are a lot of similarities as well. I think people tend to overestimate the pop cultural/societal similarities between the 2000s and 2010s. While the 2000s may have laid the groundwork for the 2010s through the development of social media among other things, there's a significant contrast in the way people lived through the two decades. In the 2000s, people were still largely reliant on physical media to consume entertainment. For instance, I had a portable CD player to listen to music back when I was a kid and we would often go to the video store to rent out a movie. Those activities have been made redundant through the advent of streaming services, which were for the most part, non-existent through the noughties. The differences also extend into the pop culture of the two decades. Although the 2000s saw the rise of auto-tune and an increased emphasis on image, there was undeniably a lot more diversity on the Top-40 charts. This is an aspect that the 2010s have severely lacked and the music scene has become too reliant on EDM and to a lesser extent, Trap music to drive the mainstream music industry forward. In contrast, genres such as bubblegum-pop, Nu-Metal, pop-punk, post-grunge, electropop, crunk and snap all achieved success on the Top-40 charts throughout parts of the 2000s.
|
|
|
Post by TheUser98 on Aug 29, 2018 2:50:27 GMT 10
I think the 1900's and 1910's are very similar decades. Both were defined as the post-Victorian, post-guilded age culture, dominated by the rise of the automobile, wax cylinders, barbershop quartets, ragtime music, and short silent films.
SharksFan99 likes this
|
|
|
Post by Cassie on Sept 5, 2019 13:38:08 GMT 10
The 60s and 70s
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2019 0:08:27 GMT 10
The 1990s, 2000s and 2010s were definitely similar as the music from each was crap!
|
|
|
Post by Cassie on Sept 6, 2019 2:32:17 GMT 10
The 1990s, 2000s and 2010s were definitely similar as the music from each was crap! When was the last good decade for music?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2019 3:00:53 GMT 10
The 1970s.
|
|
|
Post by John Titor on Sept 7, 2019 9:37:24 GMT 10
2000s and 80s
from an aesthetic perspective, in 2002 80s style started coming back . Materialism was also kind of the same in both decades, with both having a recession at the end of their decades.
astropoug likes this
|
|
|
Post by astropoug on Apr 18, 2022 15:32:34 GMT 10
The 1930s and 1940s for me personally. Not only were both decades ATROCIOUS for humanity, but also the movies, technology, aesthetics, and music of both decades is similar.
|
|
|
Post by astropoug on Jun 2, 2022 17:59:08 GMT 10
I think the 1900's and 1910's are very similar decades. Both were defined as the post-Victorian, post-guilded age culture, dominated by the rise of the automobile, wax cylinders, barbershop quartets, ragtime music, and short silent films. Another thing both decades have in common? They’re both horrifically racist decades.
|
|
|
Post by nightmarefarm on Jun 4, 2022 15:57:45 GMT 10
2010s and 2020s(so far)
|
|
|
Post by astropoug on Jun 29, 2022 8:04:19 GMT 10
We’re still only in the 3rd year of the decade. It generally takes a couple more years for the decade to truly become distinct from the previous. People were saying the same thing for previous decades. That 2012 felt like the 2000s, 2002 felt like the 90s, 1992 felt like the 80s, 1982 felt like the 70s, 1972 felt like the 60s, 1962 felt like the 50s, etc. I mean, the 60s culture that we all know and love didn’t truly take shape until 1964. It’s possible a similar thing could happen with this decade.
10slover likes this
|
|
|
Post by nightmarefarm on Jun 29, 2022 8:42:20 GMT 10
We’re still only in the 3rd year of the decade. It generally takes a couple more years for the decade to truly become distinct from the previous. People were saying the same thing for previous decades. That 2012 felt like the 2000s, 2002 felt like the 90s, 1992 felt like the 80s, 1982 felt like the 70s, 1972 felt like the 60s, 1962 felt like the 50s, etc. I mean, the 60s culture that we all know and love didn’t truly take shape until 1964. It’s possible a similar thing could happen with this decade. 2012 and 2002 were completely different than their predecessor decades. 2012 because smartphones and a huge list of other things. 2002 because 9/11.
|
|
|
Post by astropoug on Jun 29, 2022 9:09:57 GMT 10
We’re still only in the 3rd year of the decade. It generally takes a couple more years for the decade to truly become distinct from the previous. People were saying the same thing for previous decades. That 2012 felt like the 2000s, 2002 felt like the 90s, 1992 felt like the 80s, 1982 felt like the 70s, 1972 felt like the 60s, 1962 felt like the 50s, etc. I mean, the 60s culture that we all know and love didn’t truly take shape until 1964. It’s possible a similar thing could happen with this decade. 2012 and 2002 were completely different than their predecessor decades. 2012 because smartphones and a huge list of other things. 2002 because 9/11. In hindsight, I agree 1992, 2002, and 2012 are very distinct from their preceding decades, but that's the key: hindsight. If you look on old forums (like inthe00s), you'll find people saying that 2012 didn't feel that different from the 2000s.
|
|