Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2019 6:50:36 GMT 10
I know we're never really going to go back to the conservative shirts and skirts of the 1940s to mid-1960s, but I can't help but love that whole period in fashion. But maybe something form-fitting but dapper would do well in the swingin' 2020s - we might not get suits and skirts again, but maybe something similarly bespoke and hemmed with care. I just really like that refined look, and I wish we could go back to that being the norm rather than more casual wear.
Do you get what I mean? Any idea what the next decade's fashion could look like?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2019 9:05:33 GMT 10
I don't dress all out in a bespoke Armani suit or anything but I like to think I dress conservatively in the colder months with a butonned shirt, wool sweater and leather boots (with jeans though admittedly). People in customer service become extra nice to me
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2019 9:31:41 GMT 10
I know this is from a movie, but still, would it be so bad if the fashion was simplistic but formal-ish again?
|
|
|
Post by mc98 on Aug 25, 2019 10:15:48 GMT 10
I must admit people in the 1950s and below did look classy:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2019 10:31:16 GMT 10
I must admit people in the 1950s and below did look classy: I would include 1960s in that if you watched Mad Men (the show that revived the dapper look in the late 2000s).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2019 11:00:41 GMT 10
I don't remember any such revival in the late 2000s. Then again I was a teenager then, maybe my age cohort wasn't affected by it.
|
|
|
Post by al on Aug 25, 2019 11:29:02 GMT 10
Honestly I don’t think the formality is ever gonna come back. Imo these stretchy and sweatproof materials are the futuristic fabrics people wondered about in the twentieth century. Plus it’s getting too hard to enforce dress codes, now that we’re more knowledgeable about gender identity and sensory issues, never mind personal style having a greater breadth than ever. That said, I think our ever expanding perception of what’s acceptable includes concepts of being over dressed, not just under. I’m at least hoping we’ll have been exposed to enough clothing styles eventually that we don’t feel location or others dress has to affect the way we dress. The concept of our society getting informal and relaxed doesn’t have to kill old customs and aesthetics if people actually like them. An interesting related phenomena is “Dapper Day” at Disney parks. It originally started as an ode to when Disneyland first opened in the 50’s and visitors would wear suits and party dresses. Many people like taking photos at the park all dressed up now, and enjoy the classy feel. While it’s a fun concept, I also wouldn’t want it enforced on me all the time. Being a special occasion is what makes it novel.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2019 11:53:37 GMT 10
I don't remember any such revival in the late 2000s. Then again I was a teenager then, maybe my age cohort wasn't affected by it. I lived in downtown Toronto so I was exposed to hipsters/fashionistas a lot. Thrift store retro 1950s/1960s fashion in general was big circa 2008-2015.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2019 12:01:45 GMT 10
Honestly I don’t think the formality is ever gonna come back. Imo these stretchy and sweatproof materials are the futuristic fabrics people wondered about in the twentieth century. There are these dressy sweatpants you can get at Lululemon. You honestly can't tell they're sweatpants until you touch them. They look like regular dress pants. They're apparently as comfortable as sweatpants too. They cost like $200 and I don't need to dress like that so often that comfort becomes a concern, but if I did I'd know where I'd be getting my "dress" pants
|
|
|
Post by al on Aug 25, 2019 14:17:06 GMT 10
There are these dressy sweatpants you can get at Lululemon. You honestly can't tell they're sweatpants until you touch them. They look like regular dress pants. They're apparently as comfortable as sweatpants too. They cost like $200 and I don't need to dress like that so often that comfort becomes a concern, but if I did I'd know where I'd be getting my "dress" pants I just searched them and they look pretty good. I’m a big fan of knit jeggings. I have some that you can’t really tell apart from normal jeans but are way more flexible and don’t bag out as much. These fabrics conform to the body so well that traditional pants (especially as their quality sinks) are starting to look dumpy in comparison. Lately I’ve been thinking about how even a lot of just straight up exercise clothes can be more flattering than regular clothes, which I think is a big reason for the shift.
|
|