|
Post by rainbow on Oct 3, 2020 10:17:46 GMT 10
The title might confuse you, so let me explain.
Sometimes, I hear people complaining about today's pop music, and often times people will respond "You think it's better because it's nostalgic to you! You just have to look hard enough to search for the good songs!"
But the thing is, back in like the early 2010's, I didn't have to look "hard enough" for good songs because they were already reaching the billboard charts. I'm usually not the one to complain about modern day stuff, but IMO I truly do believe pop music was a lot more diverse sounding back in the early 2010's. Could I be biased because it was my childhood? Yes, but a lot of early 2010's songs aren't even that nostalgic to me, yet I still like them because they sound less generic than pop music today.
Which brings me to my next question. Do we really think music was better in the past because of nostalgia? It's a tricky question because music taste is subjective. I guess this could also kinda relate to if your birth year affects your music taste.
kev2000sfan likes this
|
|
|
Post by rainbow on Oct 3, 2020 10:21:26 GMT 10
Basically what I’m asking is if we think music sucks now because of nostalgia, or is it actually because pop music is in fact less diverse today.
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Oct 3, 2020 10:43:08 GMT 10
Yes, and no. People have different tastes in music of course, but I do think music in general was of more substance and of an overall higher standard in the past. I think the overwhelming majority of people would say that "Strawberry Fields Forever" by The Beatles is a better song than anything released by the likes of Lil Peep or XXXTentacion, for instance. You don't just have to be a fan of rock music to recognise the difference in quality between the two releases. There are thousands of people in their teens across the globe who are fans of 'classic' artists and bands such as Queen, Aretha Franklin, Pink Floyd etc. I do feel as though there is some merit in people saying that music was better in the past.
Nostalgia does play a huge role in it too though. I know for me personally, the music of the Late 2000s is hugely nostalgic for me (whether it be rock, pop, or rap) considering the fact that I was 8-10 years old during the era. I realise that songs such as "My Life Would Suck Without You", "Untouched" and "Gives You Hell" really aren't that great in the grand scheme of things, but listening to them instantly brings back great memories I have of being a kid in the Late 2000s and because of that, I perceive them through rose-tinted glasses. Music from the Early 2010s doesn't have that same sentimental feeling for me because I was in my tweens/early teens during the era and starting to go through puberty. Someone younger than me would feel differently about them though, just as someone older wouldn't feel the same way as I do over the Late 2000s.
rainbow, jaydawg89, and 2 more like this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2020 19:43:27 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Telso on Oct 3, 2020 20:53:24 GMT 10
There were bad songs in the past, good songs in the present. Bad years in general for the charts in the past (1960, 1974, 1980, 1986 in my opinion), as well as great ones in the last ten years (2011, 2013, 2015). It's all a combination of factors and tastes honestly, not just a black-and-white "it's bad cause it's recent and good because of nostalgia".
|
|
|
Post by al on Oct 5, 2020 23:40:19 GMT 10
Earlier in the decade, I had been reading quite about the looming “monogenre” and I do think that has become somewhat of a problem regarding today’s sound. (See: Country)
We also seem to have reached a new era in formulaic songwriting: Lyrics based on popular tweets, hashtags, advertisements, etc. (See: Country)
|
|