|
Post by SharksFan99 on Dec 10, 2020 15:44:30 GMT 10
This was a random thought I had the other day. With all of the pop culture and scientific advancements that have occurred since the mid-20th Century, not to mention the revolutionary breakthroughs of social media and smartphones, it feels like we've reached the upmost peak of where we can go as a society. In a sense, it feels as if all of the hard work throughout history has already been achieved to get to where we are today in 2020. We went from black & white television, racial segregation and gender inequality in the 1950s, to a time where people can now talk to someone on the opposite side of the world at the touch of a fingertip and people of all walks of life are openly embraced, all in the span of about 60 years or so.
Yet, we can only keep on going forward from here. If you think about how much has changed in the world since half a century ago, it really does makes you wonder what the year 2070 will be like. What advancements in medicine and technology will occur during the 2040s, 2050s and 2060s? 1970 is a completely different world from the year 2020. No one could have possibly envisioned the World Wide Web, IVF treatments, smartphones etc. back then.
One thing that I find particularly interesting is the idea of humans one day achieving complete immortality, whether that be in the form of mind uploading, cloning, or a type of anti-aging medicine. I can remember reading a prediction on the 2030s Wikipedia page where one scientist (who's name I can't think of off the top of my head) predicted that there is a 50/50 chance of achieving this by 2036. I personally have my doubts that the medicine will evolve to that point by then since 2036 is just over 15 years away, but I do think it will be achieved in some form in another 50 years from now.
It's a strange thought. It hasn't really occurred to me before, but at just age 21 in the year 2020, I could possibly live to a time in the future where an anti-aging treatment is readily available for use. I won't reach retirement age until around 2064, and even if I do make it to then, I will still only be 65 years old; I could possibly live for another 25-30 years after that. Who's to say what the world will be like by then. The whole concept we currently have of life and death may no longer be a thing by the time many of us are of an elderly age.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2020 15:56:53 GMT 10
The book Sapiens by Yuval Noah Hariri tackled this subject and it kept blowing my mind thinking about it. I'm not sure when it will be achieved but I also read an article recently about scientists successful lengthening the telomeres in mice and this leading to positive results. Telomeres are tentatively considered the key to reversing aging. As you age the ends of them tend to get shorter, and to oversimplify things-- this leads to cell degradation and more errors in cell function, so that's going to be an interesting space to watch. www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12664-x
SharksFan99 likes this
|
|
|
Post by mc98 on Dec 10, 2020 16:43:11 GMT 10
Due to religious reasons, I cannot accept this. We finish life at some point, there is no escape from death no matter what technological advancements we use. Plus, I don't want to live for a thousand to million years, I don't think humans will have the mental capacity to live that long.
rainbow and goodbants like this
|
|
|
Post by goodbants on Dec 10, 2020 17:13:56 GMT 10
Due to religious reasons, I cannot accept this. We finish life at some point, there is no escape from death no matter what technological advancements we use. Plus, I don't want to live for a thousand to million years, I don't think humans will have the mental capacity to live that long. I agree. I can’t imagine living forever. I would get so bored. There’s so many factors that come into play. If everyone lived forever, where would we put all these people? Earth certainly isn’t apt to handle that. It would be a miserable experience for most people imo.
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Dec 10, 2020 17:34:17 GMT 10
The book Sapiens by Yuval Noah Hariri tackled this subject and it kept blowing my mind thinking about it. I'm not sure when it will be achieved but I also read an article recently about scientists successful lengthening the telomeres in mice and this leading to positive results. Telomeres are tentatively considered the key to reversing aging. As you age the ends of them tend to get shorter, and to oversimplify things-- this leads to cell degradation and more errors in cell function, so that's going to be an interesting space to watch. www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12664-xThat's a pretty interesting development. I like to look up articles relating to new advances in science from time to time, but this is the first I've heard about that. It makes you wonder if anti-aging technology may be developed a lot sooner than when many of us anticipate. There’s so many factors that come into play. If everyone lived forever, where would we put all these people? Earth certainly isn’t apt to handle that. It would be a miserable experience for most people imo. It actually could result in a decrease in the number of births, as there would no longer be the societal pressure for people to settle down and have children in their twenties and thirties. We also can't assume that every single person on the planet will choose to live indefinitely. It would be entirely optional, many would choose not to out of religious reasons, others may simply not have the desire to prolong their life in any way. Honestly, i'm of the belief that the availability of anti-aging technology would have far more benefits than detriments. Clinically-ill patients could have a chance of extending their lives and curing their symptoms, the number of cases of Alzheimer's, Dementia etc. could dramatically decline as they wouldn't be brought on by the effects of aging.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2020 0:17:45 GMT 10
There will be benefits and drawbacks. I'm thinking of all the knowledge and experiences that dies when the person dies with them. If the greats like Albert Einstein or Stephen Hawking were alive today where would we be? It takes 30 years to get a Physics PhD and then you're only working 30 years after that before you retire. If we could extend that to 1000+ years then I can only imagine the reservoir of knowledge a person can become.
kev2000sfan likes this
|
|
|
Post by kev2000sfan on Dec 11, 2020 0:27:01 GMT 10
Its incredibly unlikely that, it shouldn't happen. I would personally love it up until a 1000 or so years, not as a clone or some other reference of it tho. I just want to be me, then I will want to rest. It won't decrease population, its apart of our mental ability and is genuinely good for stress.
There's nothing really inherently good about achieving it other than chaos.
|
|
|
Post by SharksFan99 on Jan 31, 2021 22:29:47 GMT 10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2021 13:36:58 GMT 10
Certainly it might be interesting to double my lifespan, but I don't know about immortality. When you're dead it's not like it hurts; you're dead, you don't know anyway.
|
|