|
Post by astropoug on Jul 1, 2021 6:36:30 GMT 10
We all know YouTube sucks now. 10 minute videos, crappy kids content, no originality, but when was that not the case? When short-form videos were common and you saw all sorts of weird videos getting popular? For me, it would have to be 2011. This was just before the algorithm shift from views to watch time, and so it was the last year you could make a living off videos that weren't 10 minutes long and didn't fit any trends. Viral videos like Nyan Cat could still come out. You had comedy channels like nigahiga, Smosh, and kevjumba making big videos, whilst making actual original content. 2012 was a transitional year. They switched the algorithm during this year. Lets players like Pewdiepie were beginning to rise in popularity. Still, you had viral videos and those comedy channels still being successful. The Cosmic Panda layout doesn't feel modern or old-school, it feels transitional. 2013 was when Pewdiepie began the number one most subscribed YouTube channel, they switched to the YouTube One layout, and they removed video responses. Not to mention, you had trends like Vine compilations starting to emerge.
|
|
|
Post by y2kbaby on Jul 1, 2021 8:11:20 GMT 10
IMO, 2009 was the last year where YouTube overall feels completely different from the YouTube of today. In 2009, majority of the videos was filmed in very low quality. HD didn't came out until November that year. VEVO just got started but it wasn't well known until 2009 ended. The website used to have a 5 Star Rating, then it change to Thumbs Up/Down of today. On top of that, Chad Hurley was still the CEO of YouTube until 2010. Once Chad Hurley step down, that was when the classic phase of YouTube was either gone or on a steady decline. Not to say 2010-2012 phase wasn't classic just modern. To me, 2006-2009 is "Classic YouTube".
|
|
|
Post by mc98 on Jul 1, 2021 9:12:27 GMT 10
Totally 2009. The 5 star ratings SCREAM classic Youtube.
|
|
|
Post by 10slover on Jul 1, 2021 12:11:54 GMT 10
I'm probably the only one who thinks YouTube is better now than in the early tens/late zeroes.
The shitty part of YouTube is shittier than ever, but the GOOD part of youtube is better than even. There's just way more entertainment options, more accessibility to content, more knowledge stuff like science, geography and etc. There are channels dedicated to analysing history, philosophy, economy and so on. wtf did we have in 2011? Fred, the annoying orange and rwj? And a bunch of generic parody channels?
Smosh, some bloggers and digital corridor were salvageable, but everything else was trash. at least we didn't have political brainwashing videos.
i see zoomers saying ytb only went to sh1t after 2016 lol, it's all a matter of perspective.
|
|