|
Post by 10slover on Nov 11, 2021 6:19:50 GMT 10
I am bad at math
|
|
|
Post by dudewitdausername on Nov 11, 2021 7:00:31 GMT 10
Overlapping parts is the best
10slover likes this
|
|
|
Post by 10slover on Nov 11, 2021 7:58:55 GMT 10
Overlapping parts is the best Right, it is the only way to divide a decade in three equal parts of 3 years Looks more symmetrical and satisfying cause all the parts add up
|
|
|
Post by Telso on Nov 11, 2021 8:39:30 GMT 10
The most logical option: 2000-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2009
Nicely symmetrical, and the closest to accurately dividing the decade in 3 equal parts, since the second half starts in spring 2003 and the third in fall 2006.
|
|
|
Post by 10slover on Nov 11, 2021 10:07:48 GMT 10
The most logical option: 2000-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2009 Nicely symmetrical, and the closest to accurately dividing the decade in 3 equal parts, since the second half starts in spring 2003 and the third in fall 2006. Like this? 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 1/2 2003 1/2, 2004, 2005, 2006 1/2 2006 1/2, 2007, 2008, 2009 Wonky but it works
|
|
|
Post by dudewitdausername on Nov 11, 2021 10:12:23 GMT 10
The most logical option: 2000-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2009 Nicely symmetrical, and the closest to accurately dividing the decade in 3 equal parts, since the second half starts in spring 2003 and the third in fall 2006. Like this? 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 1/2 2003 1/2, 2004, 2005, 2006 1/2 2006 1/2, 2007, 2008, 2009 Wonky but it works My whole idea about it is that things should be "fluid" if that makes sense. Entirety of 2003 belongs to both early and mid, entirety of 2006 belongs to both mid and late. I also don't really like exact cutoff dates unless it's the actual beginning and end of the year or decade...
10slover likes this
|
|
|
Post by ItsMichael on Nov 11, 2021 10:35:12 GMT 10
Numerically I’d say:
Early: 2000-2002 Mid: 2003-2006 Late: 2007-2009
Culturally I’d say:
Early: 2000-2003 Mid: 2004-2007 Late: 2008-2009
dudewitdausername likes this
|
|
|
Post by 10slover on Nov 12, 2021 0:01:21 GMT 10
Numerically I’d say: Early: 2000-2002 Mid: 2003-2006 Late: 2007-2009 My only issue is that 2000-2002 and 2007-2009 are 3 years long each, but 2003-2006 is 4 years long I guess it's only an issue because it's impossible to divide 10 by 3 without overlapping
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 5:16:22 GMT 10
Depends.
The 1970s and 90s were more or less split decades, while the 80s and 10s were overall pretty similar all the way through.
10slover likes this
|
|
|
Post by dudewitdausername on Nov 12, 2021 5:32:05 GMT 10
Depends. The 1970s and 90s were more or less split decades, while the 80s and 10s were overall pretty similar all the way through. Maybe like 2012 to 2018 but 2010/2011 and 2019 were different worlds...
|
|
|
Post by mc98 on Nov 12, 2021 5:41:31 GMT 10
Depends. The 1970s and 90s were more or less split decades, while the 80s and 10s were overall pretty similar all the way through. Maybe like 2012 to 2018 but 2010/2011 and 2019 were different worlds... I consider late 2011 through mid 2018 to be the juicy center of the 2010s.
|
|
|
Post by slashpop on Nov 12, 2021 5:42:58 GMT 10
Maybe like 2012 to 2018 but 2010/2011 and 2019 were different worlds... I consider late 2011 through mid 2018 to be the juicy center of the 2010s. Why late 2011, what specifically occurred in late ? most or latter 2011 imo.
|
|
|
Post by mc98 on Nov 12, 2021 5:50:07 GMT 10
I consider late 2011 through mid 2018 to be the juicy center of the 2010s. Why late 2011, what specifically occurred in late ? most or latter 2011 imo. Second half of 2011 in general because a lot of 2010s trends were established and apparent during that time. The majority of 2000s elements were rapidly dying at the time.
|
|
|
Post by dudewitdausername on Nov 12, 2021 5:59:46 GMT 10
Maybe like 2012 to 2018 but 2010/2011 and 2019 were different worlds... I consider late 2011 through mid 2018 to be the juicy center of the 2010s. again I just really hate mid-year cutoff points so I just round it up to 2012-2018 lol. 2011-2018 also works though. Either way, 2010 and 2019 are worlds apart. Using hip hop as an example 2010: 2019:
|
|
|
Post by slashpop on Nov 12, 2021 6:03:15 GMT 10
Why late 2011, what specifically occurred in late ? most or latter 2011 imo. Second half of 2011 in general because a lot of 2010s trends were established and apparent during that time. The majority of 2000s elements were rapidly dying at the time. Yes that’s why I said latter or most, I don’t remember any shift in late 2011 specifically, it was just most of the year imo.
|
|