|
|
Post by 10slover on Nov 12, 2021 6:16:51 GMT 10
Depends. The 1970s and 90s were more or less split decades, while the 80s and 10s were overall pretty similar all the way through. Maybe like 2012 to 2018 but 2010/2011 and 2019 were different worlds... All decades are like that, 1980 and 1989 were world apart too But we're talking about relatives Compared to the 60s, 70s, 90s and 2000s... The 80s and 10s were pretty consistent
|
|
|
|
Post by 10slover on Nov 12, 2021 6:18:11 GMT 10
Eitherway i think we better stray away from the dec*deology
|
|
|
|
Post by mc98 on Nov 12, 2021 6:21:52 GMT 10
I consider late 2011 through mid 2018 to be the juicy center of the 2010s. again I just really hate mid-year cutoff points so I just round it up to 2012-2018 lol. 2011-2018 also works though. Either way, 2010 and 2019 are worlds apart. Using hip hop as an example 2010: 2019: This song right here was probably the first trap hit of the decade. No Hands could be first but I'm On One felt more authentic to it's decade.
|
|
|
|
Post by pumpkin14 on Nov 12, 2021 12:03:18 GMT 10
again I just really hate mid-year cutoff points so I just round it up to 2012-2018 lol. 2011-2018 also works though. Either way, 2010 and 2019 are worlds apart. Using hip hop as an example 2010: 2019: This song right here was probably the first trap hit of the decade. No Hands could be first but I'm On One felt more authentic to it's decade. I always felt like this was the first “real” trap song of the 2010s. I think Future was one of the earliest mumble rappers as well
|
|
|
|
Post by pumpkin14 on Nov 12, 2021 12:05:12 GMT 10
Early: 2000-2003
Mid: 2003-2006
Late: 2006-2009
I do it this way so each third stretches across 4 different years. I agree that 2003 as a whole should be early and mid simultaneously and 2006 can be mid and late simultaneously
If there were no overlap:
Early: 2000-2002
Mid: 2003-2006
Late: 2007-2009
10slover likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by ItsMichael on Nov 13, 2021 1:37:30 GMT 10
Numerically I’d say: Early: 2000-2002 Mid: 2003-2006 Late: 2007-2009 My only issue is that 2000-2002 and 2007-2009 are 3 years long each, but 2003-2006 is 4 years long I guess it's only an issue because it's impossible to divide 10 by 3 without overlapping To me the mid point of a decade should be the longest since it is the most important part of the decade. 2003 is, for the most part, early 2000s but this is just from a cultural point of view. I always look at 3 as a mid number.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2021 16:01:30 GMT 10
Numerically
Very Early 2000s: Saturday, January 1, 2000 through Friday, August 31, 2001
Early 2000s: Saturday, September 1, 2001 through Wednesday, April 30, 2003
Early to Mid 2000s: Thursday, May 1, 2003 through Friday, December 31, 2004
Mid to Late 2000s: Saturday, January 1, 2005 through Thursday, August 31, 2006
Late 2000s: Friday, September 1, 2006 through Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Very Late 2000s: Thursday, May 1, 2008 through Thursday, December 31, 2009
Pop Culturally
Y2K Era: January and February 2000
Y2K Era Slowly Dying: March 2000 through June 2001
Early 2000s: July 2001 through March 2003
Early to Mid 2000s: April 2003 through August 2004
Mid 2000s: September 2004 through July 2006
Mid to Late 2000s: August 2006 through June 2007
Late 2000s: July 2007 through August 2009
Early 2010s Precursor: September through December 2009
slashpop likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by slashpop on Nov 15, 2021 16:14:27 GMT 10
Very Early 2000s: Saturday, January 1, 2000 through Friday, August 31, 2001 Early 2000s: Saturday, September 1, 2001 through Wednesday, April 30, 2003 Early to Mid 2000s: Thursday, May 1, 2003 through Friday, December 31, 2004 Mid to Late 2000s: Saturday, January 1, 2005 through Thursday, August 31, 2006 Late 2000s: Friday, September 1, 2006 through Wednesday, April 30, 2008 Very Late 2000s: Thursday, May 1, 2008 through Thursday, December 31, 2009 Pretty much. Only part I would change is September/October 2019 being 2010s/leaning 2010s. You can say August or July was early 2000s but September 1 is fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by 10slover on Nov 15, 2021 18:48:14 GMT 10
NumericallyVery Early 2000s: Saturday, January 1, 2000 through Friday, August 31, 2001 Early 2000s: Saturday, September 1, 2001 through Wednesday, April 30, 2003 Early to Mid 2000s: Thursday, May 1, 2003 through Friday, December 31, 2004 Mid to Late 2000s: Saturday, January 1, 2005 through Thursday, August 31, 2006 Late 2000s: Friday, September 1, 2006 through Wednesday, April 30, 2008 Very Late 2000s: Thursday, May 1, 2008 through Thursday, December 31, 2009 Pop CulturallyY2K Era: January and February 2000 Y2K Era Slowly Dying: March 2000 through June 2001 Early 2000s: July 2001 through March 2003 Early to Mid 2000s: April 2003 through August 2004 Mid 2000s: September 2004 through July 2006 Mid to Late 2000s: August 2006 through June 2007 Late 2000s: July 2007 through August 2009 Early 2010s Precursor: September through December 2009 Overcomplicated 👀
dudewitdausername likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by dudewitdausername on Nov 15, 2021 23:41:24 GMT 10
Stick your uncomplicated division…but it doesn't matter much...tbh yeah, but at the same time I don't think it goes this deep. Every year is a transition in one way or another, some more than others (9/11, COVID, etc), which is why you still see people arguing about whether 2019, 2020 or 2021 are a "transitional year", they all are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2021 4:21:36 GMT 10
Stick your uncomplicated division…but it doesn't matter much...tbh yeah, but at the same time I don't think it goes this deep. Every year is a transition in one way or another, some more than others (9/11, COVID, etc), which is why you still see people arguing about whether 2019, 2020 or 2021 are a "transitional year", they all are. Many users on here, including myself, experienced the years you mentioned, agree with the divisions. Those numerical divisions work for any decade, not just the 2000s. With the numerical divisions, I’m not talking about the culture with the random transitions. I didn’t make them up out of the blue. I disagree that every year is transitional. Some years are stagnant culturally, which may not necessarily be a bad thing. I didn't make every year look split or transitional.
slashpop likes this
|
|
|
|
Post by dudewitdausername on Nov 16, 2021 4:26:56 GMT 10
yeah, but at the same time I don't think it goes this deep. Every year is a transition in one way or another, some more than others (9/11, COVID, etc), which is why you still see people arguing about whether 2019, 2020 or 2021 are a "transitional year", they all are. Many users on here, including myself, experienced the years you mentioned, agree with the divisions. Those numerical divisions work for any decade, not just the 2000s. With the numerical divisions, I’m not talking about the culture with the random transitions. I didn’t make them up out of the blue. I disagree that every year is transitional. Some years are stagnant culturally, which may not necessarily be a bad thing. I didn't make every year look split or transitional. I agree that some years are stagnant, but most years are transitional in some way. Stagnant years are more rare, not transitional ones IMO. I just think it's pointless to cut out defined cultural eras when it's normally all over the place with holdovers, etc. and September 2006 would still have more in common with April 2006 despite it being cut into the same "era" as April 2008 for example. An exception to this is March 2020 because something that changed everyone's lives happened, which IMO makes it more like today than any point before it, even January 2020.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
0 |
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2021 4:41:35 GMT 10
Many users on here, including myself, experienced the years you mentioned, agree with the divisions. Those numerical divisions work for any decade, not just the 2000s. With the numerical divisions, I’m not talking about the culture with the random transitions. I didn’t make them up out of the blue. I disagree that every year is transitional. Some years are stagnant culturally, which may not necessarily be a bad thing. I didn't make every year look split or transitional. I agree that some years are stagnant, but most years are transitional in some way. Stagnant years are more rare, not transitional ones IMO. I just think it's pointless to cut out defined cultural eras when it's normally all over the place with holdovers, etc. and September 2006 would still have more in common with April 2006 despite it being cut into the same "era" as April 2008 for example. An exception to this is March 2020 because something that changed everyone's lives happened, which IMO makes it more like today than any point before it, even January 2020. I see what you mean about cultural eras as not everyone agrees with them, so it’s subjective and best to agree to disagree in that case. The cultural eras I listed are my opinion and based on my experience of those years, so it varies on person and location. I’m cool with people agreeing and or disagreeing with me on that. I see March 2020 to present as the same, but not completely foreign from late 2018 through February 2020. The way I divided the 2000s numerically isn’t useless or pointless. It’s more precise than just early, mid and late 2000s to me. For instance, the early 2000s, like any given period, have a set of years defining it, regardless of carryovers. They aren't everywhere. There’s always been close grouping of years related to defining the main range and limits of early, mid and late periods, which people have their preferences on. Shared experience and history justify many similarities, and it's perfectly fine to group and discuss them however detailed as one chooses. There’s no right or wrong way.
slashpop likes this
|
|
